Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Vigilante or Hero?

Vigilante or Hero?

A lot has been made in these parts of the world about a very simple trespassing and firearms case. Nine months ago, in a small community nearby called Burton is where all of this took place. Around 2:30 in the morning, a neighbour of Lawrence Manzer heard trespassers going through his yard. Now in this community there had been vandalism being applied to homes, so naturally the owner wanted to get rid of these trespassers. As this gentleman was confronting the three trespassers, Lawrence Manzer decided to assist him like any good neighbour would. So, Lawrence Manzer grabbed his shotgun and shells and proceeded to assist his neighbour. The sixteen year old involved were sitting on the ground when police officers arrived. Lawrence Manzer’s neighbour asked him to put away the gun shortly before they arrived. The youths involved were ticketed for a liquor offense, the neighbour for assault (later dropped) and Mr. Manzer was charged also for “possessing a weapon for a dangerous to the public peace.” Here is where the whole case gets interesting. Follow me on this one.

There has been a huge public outcry that has actually hit the west coast of Canada. I live on the east coast and Canada is a very big country. This gentleman has been getting support and funds from all over. Now let us look at the facts of this.
1] The kids were drinking and no harm was done to the properties in question.
2] They were drinking and were ticketed for such by the police offers that finally did arrive.
3] Mr. Manzer did not call the police and decided to take matters in his own hands.
4] He brought a shotgun and in no way was his life even close to being threatened.
When a person just looks at the facts, what Mr. Manzer did was illegal. Instead of calling the police and letting them do their job, he took matters into his own hands. Once of the defense used was he was protecting his property. The kids were not on his property.
If this were me or anyone else, we would have been charged because what we did was illegal. For him, it was illegal too. The most frustrating part of this whole crime is that Mr. Manzer has gone on record as saying he has won the public opinion. Well I would like to know what percentage of the public actual supports him and are they going to be bringing out guns whenever something happens. I do not want to live there.
It reminded me of a huge legal case up here involving a gentleman called Robert Latimer. If you want look this one up but I will say he went to jail even though he had the full country’s support. He went to jail because euthanasia is illegal here in Canada.

Now you may think this is an extreme example however I think that he honestly believes he was in the right even though the law states he is not. In the end all he is going to get is a fine. The same as the kids that night who were breaking the law too. I bet they actually were very sober when the police were finally called in.

3 comments:

  1. I do not think it's an extreme example at all! I agree with oyu all the way!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is just another case of the law protecting the criminals. These kids were seasoned vandals and thieves, just happened to get caught on this occasion, and quite frankly were lucky all they got was a scare.

    There are numerous similar examples of people reacting on their own, and in many cases getting off with doing so. I'm sure it frustrates law officers when they're shown as unable to do their job as well as regular people, but the fact remains if they were able to prevent such things then people might not feel the need to employ scare tactics such as this. You failed to mention, by the way, Manzer's gun was never loaded. As such, obviously no shots were ever fired, much less at any of the perpetrators.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you about hte law protecting the people. WHat is the frustrating part in this is that because of a certain public outcry what will happen. The kids were fined for what they did. It was never ssaid they were vandals. Drunk yes but vandals no. They were almost convicted before they did anything and did get fined for drinking under age.

    Manzer has such support in this that most people want his case thrown out. Well he should pay his fine too. That is all he will get. A fine.

    Another aspect of this whole case that gets on my nerves is the sensationalism of it and what might happen to him in a court of law, which in all honesty is nothing. He will pay up and leave. That is it.

    ReplyDelete